Having read the resent article in the Herald on the viaduct, I'm still at a loss as to whether the issue to tear to down the Viaduct is an objective issue or a political issue.

The question in my mind is that if they can repair the worst part of the viaduct, why can't they repair the rest of it. I try to be objective, but I keep coming back to suspecting the issue is political.

Please do more investigating on this concern, including interviewing Victor Gray and other non political engineers.

Louis Hilton

West Seattle