Get Highline facts straight
Tue, 12/13/2005
I am writing in response to the Op-Ed article written by Karen Veloria and Doris Tevaseu in the Dec. 7 West Seattle Herald (and) White Center News.
These two ladies have made some statements that need some clarification and qualification. They are both on the Highline Unincorporated Area Council, but let's get some of the facts straight.
Karen Veloria says that more time is needed to reach the residents of the North Highline area for the study of annexation. She has been a member of the Highline Council since May 2005. If she wants more time to get people to attend the council meeting and be informed, why, since her election in May, it would appear that she has not gotten but very few people to these meetings and hearings. How much time does she need ?
Also, the first time I/we saw her at a council meeting was when she showed up to give us her background for running for the council. The North Highline Council has been making studies and collecting information and facts since 1995 and most seriously in 2005.
Sure, many people would like to stay unincorporated, but, as I understand it, state law says unincorporated areas have to either incorporate or get annexed by the year 2013. So some action must be accomplished soon, as it will take several years to accomplish any completed action when all parties agree and the vote is taken.
Doris Tevaseu is a member at-large of the council because she works in White Center, but she lives in Bellevue. She seems to have a great love for Seattle, but chooses to not live there. Yet, she wants us citizens who live in the Highline Area to become part of Seattle.
It upsets me to no end to have someone who does not live in the area, nor partake in the day-to-day living in an area, to attempt to tell the citizens living there what their best options are. Sure, she works for an organization that works with the members of the ethnic community of the Highline Area. But, to us citizens living in the area there is much more at stake than social services.
In reading their article, it would appear that nothing has been done to find out what their people want. Well, for the past eight months the Highline Council and King County has been conducting polls and fact finding information on annexation and, if you read their results, there has been a good amount of these people polled and interviewed.
But, if the interviewer was not invited in or accepted to every home selected, then whose fault is that? They have the right to their opinion and their ideas but every time someone decides to finally pay attention and we go back to square one, (it) is a waste of time and money.
Also, very few of these so-called interested citizens have even went to the trouble to attend the meetings when invited or publicized for their information and benefit.
As local homeowners, my wife and I have been attending these public meetings for at least 18 months. All other citizens of the area had access to the same information we have and could have been at these meetings to learn what is happening in our community.
The majority of the council recommended Burien because, with the facts we have, that is the best option out of all the information that we/they have received.
Let's at least get the facts of their status and information correct.
Bob Price
White Center
(resident for 25+ years)