Why not a Duwamish tunnel? 20 questions answered
Sat, 05/30/2020
Editor's Note: When Westside Seattle published Bob Ortblad's Op-Ed regarding the construction of an Immersed Tube Tunnel (ITT) to replace the now damaged and closed West Seattle Bridge, it got the attention of people around the entire region including Mayor Durkan, the Seattle City Council and others. Questions about how it could work, where and how it could connect, what it would cost and how long it would take emerged. We asked Ortblad to explore his concept further and answer the top 20 questions he's gotten.
Our original coverage can be found here
Why not repair the bridge?
Cracks in the two box girders have formed a 4,600-ton "inverted keystone" in the center of the main span. SDOT consultants WSP have reported that the girder cracking will likely continue which has led to contingency plans in the event of a disaster. Any repair will have to carry this massive dead weight, plus the structural repair’s weight, plus the traffic live load. It would be like building a new bridge to hold up an old bridge plus the traffic live load.
Why not replace the bridge?
A 2007 United State Geological Survey report locates the Seattle Fault (first recognized in 1992) directly below the bridge and that the soil is likely to liquefy in a moderate earthquake. Any solution now must meet a 2500 Year event standard. The new bridge would also have over a half a mile of 6% grade. Let's not repeat a past mistake.
Why not a Deep Bored tunnel like Bertha?
As Seattle learned with Bertha, a bored tunnel requires a massive expensive boring machine that can get stuck deep underground. A boring machine would have to go very deep, some 200 feet to find solid ground, making a bored tunnel very long and expensive.
What is an Immersed Tube Tunnel and how is it built?
An immersed tube tunnel is a very simple design. They are like an oversize concrete box culvert sunk into a shallow trench on the bottom of a river. The concrete tube segments are constructed in a dry-dock, towed to the crossing site, lowered into a pre-dredged trench then connected to cut-and-cover built down-ramps. The cut-and-cover excavation will need a method to support the trench wall in soft soil. Sheet piling, Secant piles, or a Slurry wall are three options. It's not very common, with fewer than 100 worldwide but they seem to be gaining favor as their advantages become clear.
Is an Immersed Tube Tunnel a new concept?
The first immersed tube tunnel was a railroad tunnel built in 1906 under the Detroit River. It was round and made of steel. The first concrete box style tube tunnel was built in Holland in 1942. It is the model for more than 150 similar worldwide tunnels.
Where on the Duwamish can an Immersed Tube Tunnel be built?
The best site for a Duwamish tunnel is just north of the Swing Bridge. City Light has a transmission line crossing at this site. The power lines could be placed in a utilidor in the tunnel. Only two 250-foot tunnel segments are needed to cross the river.
Where can we build the Immersed Tube Tunnel segments?
The tube segments can be built in the Aberdeen Casting Basin used for the SR520 pontoons or at Concrete Tech’s dry-dock in Tacoma. Each of the two segments will weight about 27,500 tons, half the weight of several recent European tunnels.
How long would it take to build an Immersed Tube Tunnel?
The British Columbia 2,000-foot immersed tunnel under the Fraser River was built in 1959 in two years and two months. A Duwamish tunnel would be one fourth as long, at approximately 500 feet. A tunnel can be started immediately and could save a year or more in construction time. The tubes can be built off-site, and the down ramps are outside of the bridge's defined fall-zone meaning it could start much sooner. A new bridge must wait for the demolition of the current bridge.
Can an Immersed Tube Tunnel also include Sound Transit light rail?
Yes, an immersed tube tunnel is ideal for light rail. A tube can be configured in any combination of vehicle and transit lanes. A tube tunnel can handle the weight of the train much better than a long-span bridge. Sound Transit has one underwater bored tunnel under the Montlake Cut and tunnels in Beacon Hill and out to the University of Washington.
How much would an Immersed Tube Tunnel cost?
Cost is a relative question. A tunnel will cost less than a new traffic bridge, plus the cost of a new bridge for light rail. A tunnel may be less or about the same as a new combined bridge for traffic and light rail. Any bridge would require 200-foot pilings, 150-foot piers, and a 600-foot center span that can carry over 800 tons of vehicles and light rail. A tunnel can easily carry this load, with a 5-foot concrete floor spread over 1.6 acres, and is a much safer and economic design. A tunnel is also a good long-term value. A bridge is designed for a 75-year life. A tunnel is designed for a 150-year life.
How deep would the tunnel be?
An NOAA survey has measured the crossing site at -25 to -30 feet MLLW. The navigation requirement is -30 MLLW feet. The lowest point of the roadway would be about -55 feet MLLW (-62 feet Mean Sea Level).
How much dredging would be required?
A trench will require about dredging of 136,000 cubic yards. This is a little over the 100,000 cubic yards done annually to maintain the Duwamish Waterway. The Port of Seattle plans to dredge 1,155,000 cubic yards to improve the East & West waterways.
Would the dredge and ramp excavation be toxic?
A Port of Seattle map shows Superfund Sites to North, East, and South but none near the Spokane Street bridges. Harbor Island itself is a Superfund site so any construction done there, even two new bridges would require some remediation work. Sampling will need to be done. Average Superfund sites cost around $26 million for soil remediation.
How do you connect to current elevated east and west highway sections?
A tunnel will not connect to, or use the elevated high sections. Elevated highways connect to the current bridge at an elevation of about 130 feet about 400 feet from the river’s edge. It would take impossible 35% down-ramps to connect to a tunnel (maximum is 6%). A tunnel will allow the removal of over a half-mile of elevated highway, freeing about 8 acres of land for development or park land.
How do you connect coming from the East?
To connect vehicle traffic, about 1,500 feet of new elevated highway is required. The connection would start just before the East Waterway, go over the waterway and lower Spokane St. and connect at ground level to the entrance to a 900-foot down ramp to the tunnel.
How do you connect at the West Delridge side?
The current Delridge off-ramp is 1,400 feet long and drops 110 feet. The current Delridge on-ramp is 1,100 feet long and climbs 60 feet. The tunnel off and on-ramps would be much shorter and less steep and simplify the current concrete jungle. The tunnel entrance/exits ramps would be at grade level at the end of Pigeon Point directly below the current elevated highway. The main highway would continue to climb to the west at a 6% grade for 400 feet, to an elevation of 34 feet. This will allow the off-ramp for traffic and light rail to continue at grade and turn left under the main highway. About 1,000 feet of new elevated highway would need to connect to existing elevated highway. A tunnel would go under both W. Marginal Way SW & SW Spokane St. before it surfaces near Pigeon Point.
What happens to an Immersed Tube Tunnel in an earthquake?
WSDOT's web site has a 5-minute YouTube explanation of the way a tunnel is the best place to be during an earthquake. An immersed tube tunnel is almost buoyant so if the ground liquefies it floats on the soft soil. Japan has 25 immersed tube tunnels and San Francisco's BART has the longest US immersed tube tunnel (3.8 miles long built in 3 years) which has weathered several earthquakes without damage. It is being seismically retrofitted.
Do you need ventilation in the tunnel?
The tunnel will be short, about 1,500 feet long (West 500’ enclosed ramp, 500’ immersed tube, plus East enclosed ramps 500’). Some vent fans and shafts can be located at each end of the tube section.
Will the Native Tribes object to a tunnel?
While they have not yet weighed in on the idea it's worth noting a tunnel will remove more than a half-a-mile of elevated concrete highway and bridge from the delta and over the river. This should improve the view, reduce traffic noise, and eliminate shadows on the delta and river. Any land lost could be exchanged for the new space. The in-river construction of a tunnel can be scheduled away from seasonal fish runs and would take very little time. British Columbia’s First Nation People demanded a new immersed tunnel over a new high bridge for a Fraser River crossing.
Is a tunnel safer than a bridge?
During an earthquake, vehicles and Sound Transit trains (which each weigh close to 300 tons) could be in the middle of a 600-foot bridge span, 150 feet over the river. A bridge such as this will be supported by 150-foot east and west bridge piers supported by pile caps resting on 200-foot pilings driven in soil subject to liquefaction. An Immersed Tube Tunnel is almost immune to earthquakes. An Immersed Tube Tunnel would also be safer than a bridge because it will have better grades (slopes into and out of it). First, the grade will be half as long. A bridge would need to go up 150 feet. A tunnel only needs to go down 62 feet. Second, the tunnel has an initial 6% down grade that allows acceleration or constant speed, with momentum to carry it into the up grade. A bridge has a long initial 6% up grade that will slow heavy trucks and buses, then a long 6% downgrade that may require braking. A tunnel is also protected from, fog, wind, rain, snow, and black ice.
Comments
Having commuted to downtown…
Having commuted to downtown Seattle from West Seattle for most of my working career, I have experienced all of the problems and improvements over the years. The logic in this is hard to refute. But when did common sense occur in our city government in recent years?
Excellent solution. How many…
Excellent solution.
How many other aging bridges in Seattle could be replaced using this method?
Build it! PLEASE! I…
Build it! PLEASE! I watched the West Seattle Bridge literally come out of the ground oh so many years ago and thought I'd never had to go through another public works project again. And now..... THIS MAKE A LOT OF SENSE!
Why was this not proposed…
Why was this not proposed for the Rt. 99 tunnel instead of the expensive deep bore tunnel that was completed only after 4 years?
Excellent idea! This is a…
Excellent idea! This is a well reasoned proposal, and I hope it receives continued study and increased exposure for awareness and support.
Please do it now. No…
Please do it now. No Seattle process.
No engineering solution is…
No engineering solution is perfect at everything, so what are the downsides? Any time I hear someone claim their solution is the best in literally every category, I'm suspicious they're hiding something.
Won't the trains need more space than that, to let people out in the event of an emergency?
How do operational and maintenance costs compare?
What are the failure modes of a submerged tunnel? The existing bridge is failing because of easily detectable materials failure. How do we know a tunnel won't suffer from similar material failure? How will we be able to detect that?
What other alternatives exist? Is this the only possible place to submerge a tunnel?
An idea I'm sure will be…
An idea I'm sure will be considered, but on schedule, let's not get too optimistic.
"Fraser River was built in 1959 in two years and two months".
This doesn't really answer the question of how long this would take. It's not necessarily just the build time, which is what I'm assuming is quoted here. There is a ton of time for planning, design, permitting, property rights, etc..
I don't think anybody should get the idea that this can be completed 2 years from now. I doubt it would be even possible to start construction in under 2 years.
Ortblad replies re:…
Ortblad replies re: Downsides
An immersed tunnel will have five parallel connected tunnels ( 2 transits, 2 traffic, 1 emergency/utilities).These tunnels will be connected with emergency doors every few hundred feet. There will be four alternative routes to safety.
- Maintenance should be less, no painting or freeze damage.
- Operations maybe more for lighting and ventilation.
- First concrete immered tunnel in Holland 1942 is still in use.
- The floor, walls, and roof of an immersed tunnel are very thick and unlikely to fail.
- I could find no reported failures. Can be designed for 150 year life.
- Best location for immersed tunnel is just north of the low bridge. There are no alternative site that would work.
The more I look the more I'm…
The more I look the more I'm pessimistic about this option. It irritates me when people act like it's the obvious solution and are ready to put down $30 million on the spot.
What about the property acquisition costs to make way for the new ramps? How does it connect to Fauntleroy, and what impacts would it have to businesses and neighborhoods in between the tube and Fauntleroy?
Is there enough clearance between the new ramps and the roadway below the ramps. It looks like the East ramp goes right over an existing East Marginal flyover, so this new ramp would have to be pretty high. Might make for a steep grade.
Some complain about the flaws and problems in the old bridge, and in the same breath are ready to eliminate all other alternatives and move forward with this one without anything more than a conceptual sketch and explanation.
I don't mean to bash the idea, but don't bash people that are probably working extremely hard to figure out the best way to move forward. They have dedicated their entire careers to this work, and are probably very good at what they do. They might be your neighbor and they want this done as quickly as possible just like you. Any good project involves evaluating options, and I'm sure this one will be considered, but don't be surprised if there are fatal flaws that eliminate it very early on.
I would like to see the…
I would like to see the author comment on the climate resiliency of this plan and how the tunnel entrances will be designed to handle the anticipated sea level rise over the lifespan of the tunnel.
Re; More questions Joe, I…
Re; More questions
Joe,
I'm not the author and he has been asked to respond. But you write:
What about the property acquisition costs to make way for the new ramps?
That's a question that Sound Transit would have to deal with too since that same space near the southern tip of Harbor Island would have to be used for a light rail bridge. A cut and cover section of a tunnel would actually create MORE usable land since it would only be a temporary disturbance and the entrance/exit on the eastside would represent the only area "lost" and would head up to the Spokane street viaduct right out of the open area. The cost to acquire land is at fair market value using the power of eminent domain. Some of it is a bike path and a small park, both of which would be restored once construction is complete. The ramps would occupy roughly the same area now used by existing roadways.. at least that's my understanding. Perhaps Ortblad will have a better explanation.
How does it connect to Fauntleroy, and what impacts would it have to businesses and neighborhoods in between the tube and Fauntleroy?
The ramp from the tunnel entrance/exit on the west would go up to the existing section of ramp making it around 1100 feet long and a 6% grade.
Is there enough clearance between the new ramps and the roadway below the ramps. It looks like the East ramp goes right over an existing East Marginal flyover, so this new ramp would have to be pretty high. Might make for a steep grade.
You can actually check this for yourself. Use Google Earth and look at the bridge. It will literally show you the elevations of any point. That's what Ortblad did. It's not millimeter precise obviously but he points out that based on about six hours of checking all these spots, there IS enough room and the ramps don't exceed 6% in grade.
Sea level rise - Habor…
Sea level rise - Habor Island is about 6 feet above sea level. If the sea level goes up the tunnel entrance level be increased with the whole island. The entrance will be at grade level.
There's no mention of the…
There's no mention of the boat traffic in the Duwamish Waterway. Could there be another boat crash?
No the tunnel would be 20…
No the tunnel would be 20 feet BELOW the river bed.
Would this Proposed tunnel…
Would this Proposed tunnel option connect to Hwy 99 North?
Yes, just as the ramps east…
Yes, just as the ramps east of the river do now, though it would require a tear down of the approach and rebuild into the existing roadway
As I just wrote in the…
As I just wrote in the original article, I suggest adding (extra) dedicated lanes for emergency vehicles and/or buses (similar to what the lower deck now provides):
1) there’s no hospital in WS.
2) even with light rail there will likely be some or many buses.
All for it. PLEASE DON'T…
All for it. PLEASE DON'T BUILD YET ANOTHER BRIDGE. The Tube Tunnel is the way to go.
This ITT seems to be a solution. Time tested with many examples.