No on Referendum 67
After reading Mary Mulcahy's letter to the editor, I'd like Ballard News-Tribune readers to hear another view of Referendum 67.
I am voting to reject Referendum 67. This is a law that was written by trial lawyers to benefit trial lawyers. It testimony before the (State House of Representatives), the prime sponsor of the bill could cite no crisis in Washington requiring the law and admitted he had simply worked with the Washington Trial Lawyers Association to write and pass the bill.
I am an insurance professional.